|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| Summary | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
PurposeWe used "competitive evaluation" in order to see what existing recipe web sites offered to users. This exploration enabled us to conform to existing interaction patterns and language conventions. In addition, we were able to locate user needs (based on our directed storytelling data) that were currently unmet in existing solutions. ProcessWe performed an evaluation of 9 recipe search and 2 nutrition web sites. We paid special attention to how information was organized (categorization structure) and how it was filtered to drill down to a particular topic. In addition, we noted any well designed features that met our user's needs. Web Sites ResearchedWe visited and wrote reports for the following websites:
We compiled our reports into a document which noted the information provided within each web site, core recipe selection interaction, interesting supplementary elements, and any other features they offered that matched the needs of our users as discovered during our directed storytelling. Our Detailed Competitive Evaluation Summary (pdf) Key InsightsPrimary Navigation
Interesting Supplementary Features
Taking it from the Web Site
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| IID.2006 - Project 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| IID 2006 . Human-Computer Interaction Institute . Carnegie Mellon University | |||||||||||||||||||||